↓ Skip to main content

Prognostic value of pre-operative inflammatory response biomarkers in gastric cancer patients and the construction of a predictive model

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Translational Medicine, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
179 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prognostic value of pre-operative inflammatory response biomarkers in gastric cancer patients and the construction of a predictive model
Published in
Journal of Translational Medicine, February 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12967-015-0409-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Qiwen Deng, Bangshun He, Xian Liu, Jin Yue, Houqun Ying, Yuqin Pan, Huiling Sun, Jie Chen, Feng Wang, Tianyi Gao, Lei Zhang, Shukui Wang

Abstract

Inflammation plays an integral role in carcinogenesis and tumor progression. Inflammatory response biomarkers have shown to be promising prognostic factors for improving the predictive accuracy in various cancers. The aim of this study is to investigate the prognostic significance of pre-operative neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), derived neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (dNLR), platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and lymphocyte to monocyte ratio (LMR) in gastric cancer (GC). 389 patients who had undergone gastrectomy were enrolled from 2007 to 2009 in this study. NLR, dNLR, PLR and LMR were calculated from peripheral blood cell count taken at pre-operation. Receiver operating curve (ROC) was used to determine the optimal cut-off levels for these biomarkers. A predictive model or nomogram was established to predict prognosis for cancer-specific survival (CSS) and disease-free survival (DFS), and the predictive accuracy of the nomogram was determined by concordance index (c-index). The median follow-up period was 24 months ranging from 3 months to 60 months. The optimal cut-off levels were 2.36 for NLR, 1.85 for dNLR, 132 for PLR and 4.95 for LMR by ROC curves analysis. Elevated NLR, dNLR and PLR were significantly associated with worse overall survival (OS), CSS and DFS, however, elevated LMR showed an adverse effect on worse OS, CSS and DFS. Multivariate analysis revealed that elevated dNLR was an independent factor for worse OS, and NLR was superior to dNLR, PLR and LMR in terms of hazard ratio (HR = 1.53, 95% CI = 1.11-2.11, P = 0.010), which was shown to be independent prognostic indicators for both CSS and DFS. Moreover, the nomogram could more accurately predict CSS (c-index: 0.89) and DFS (c-index: 0.84) in surgical GC patients. Pre-operative NLR and dNLR may serve as potential prognostic biomarkers in patients with GC who underwent surgical resection. The proposed nomograms can be used for the prediction of CSS and DFS in patients with GC who have undergone gastrectomy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 56 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 16%
Student > Master 8 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Other 5 9%
Researcher 4 7%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 14 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 24 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 18 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 February 2015.
All research outputs
#15,325,004
of 22,792,160 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#2,232
of 3,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,002
of 255,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#53
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,792,160 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,988 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,035 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.