You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The declarative system in children with specific language impairment: a comparison of meaningful and meaningless auditory-visual paired associate learning
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Psychology, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40359-015-0062-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dorothy V M Bishop, Hsinjen Julie Hsu |
| Abstract |
It has been proposed that children with Specific Language Impairment (SLI) have a selective deficit in procedural learning, with relatively spared declarative learning. In previous studies we and others confirmed deficits in procedural learning of sequences, using both verbal and nonverbal materials. Here we studied the same children using a task that implicates the declarative system, auditory-visual paired associate learning. There were parallel tasks for verbal materials (vocabulary learning) and nonverbal materials (meaningless patterns and sounds). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 8 | 29% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 7% |
| Finland | 1 | 4% |
| Canada | 1 | 4% |
| Philippines | 1 | 4% |
| Chile | 1 | 4% |
| Ireland | 1 | 4% |
| Belgium | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 12 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 71% |
| Scientists | 7 | 25% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 102 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 12% |
| Researcher | 11 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 7% |
| Other | 19 | 18% |
| Unknown | 27 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 33 | 31% |
| Neuroscience | 9 | 8% |
| Linguistics | 6 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 15% |
| Unknown | 31 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2018.
All research outputs
#1,433,460
of 23,983,367 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychology
#89
of 883 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,547
of 257,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychology
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,983,367 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 883 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,755 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.