↓ Skip to main content

Are conservation organizations configured for effective adaptation to global change?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
12 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Are conservation organizations configured for effective adaptation to global change?
Published in
Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment, April 2015
DOI 10.1890/130352
Authors

Paul R Armsworth, Eric R Larson, Stephen T Jackson, Dov F Sax, Paul Simonin, Bernd Blossey, Nancy Green, Mary L Klein, Liza Lester, Taylor H Ricketts, Michael C Runge, M Rebecca Shaw

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 5%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 127 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 42 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 15%
Student > Master 20 14%
Other 14 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 7%
Other 23 17%
Unknown 9 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 57 41%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 44 32%
Engineering 4 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 4 3%
Social Sciences 3 2%
Other 8 6%
Unknown 18 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2017.
All research outputs
#1,053,358
of 14,619,693 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment
#453
of 1,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,654
of 215,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Ecology & the Environment
#14
of 33 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,619,693 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,316 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 215,154 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 33 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.