↓ Skip to main content

How predictable is technological progress?

Overview of attention for article published in Research Policy, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 1,587)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
14 news outlets
blogs
4 blogs
twitter
572 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages
googleplus
6 Google+ users
reddit
3 Redditors
video
3 video uploaders

Citations

dimensions_citation
60 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
299 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How predictable is technological progress?
Published in
Research Policy, April 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.respol.2015.11.001
Authors

J. Doyne Farmer, François Lafond

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 572 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 299 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 4 1%
United States 3 1%
Germany 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Other 4 1%
Unknown 280 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 76 25%
Student > Master 55 18%
Researcher 43 14%
Student > Bachelor 32 11%
Unspecified 24 8%
Other 69 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 47 16%
Engineering 45 15%
Business, Management and Accounting 42 14%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 28 9%
Social Sciences 26 9%
Other 111 37%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 588. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2019.
All research outputs
#11,803
of 13,520,902 outputs
Outputs from Research Policy
#2
of 1,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#245
of 215,384 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Policy
#1
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,520,902 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,587 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 215,384 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.