↓ Skip to main content

Competency-based simulation education: should competency standards apply for simulation educators?

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
Competency-based simulation education: should competency standards apply for simulation educators?
Published in
BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning, February 2015
DOI 10.1136/bmjstel-2014-000013
Authors

Walter Eppich, Adam Cheng

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 8%
Unknown 12 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 4 31%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 15%
Student > Master 2 15%
Professor 1 8%
Librarian 1 8%
Other 3 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 46%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 31%
Social Sciences 1 8%
Arts and Humanities 1 8%
Unknown 1 8%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2015.
All research outputs
#11,172,706
of 14,087,919 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning
#213
of 237 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,037
of 216,117 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,087,919 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 237 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 2nd percentile – i.e., 2% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 216,117 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them