↓ Skip to main content

Systematic Review: Aesthetic Assessment of Breast Reconstruction Outcomes by Healthcare Professionals

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Surgical Oncology, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
Title
Systematic Review: Aesthetic Assessment of Breast Reconstruction Outcomes by Healthcare Professionals
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology, February 2015
DOI 10.1245/s10434-015-4434-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Saskia W. M. C. Maass, Shaghayegh Bagher, Stefan O. P. Hofer, Nancy N. Baxter, Toni Zhong

Abstract

Achieving an aesthetic outcome following postmastectomy breast reconstruction is both an important goal for the patient and plastic surgeon. However, there is currently an absence of a widely accepted, standardized, and validated professional aesthetic assessment scale following postmastectomy breast reconstruction.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 5 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 16%
Researcher 3 12%
Student > Postgraduate 3 12%
Unspecified 2 8%
Other 8 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 64%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 12%
Unspecified 3 12%
Psychology 2 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Other 0 0%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 September 2016.
All research outputs
#2,806,066
of 12,419,165 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#661
of 2,896 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,436
of 221,338 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#15
of 108 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,419,165 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 77th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,896 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,338 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 108 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.