↓ Skip to main content

Comparative cost of illness analysis and assessment of health care burden of Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophies in Germany

Overview of attention for article published in Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, December 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
156 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparative cost of illness analysis and assessment of health care burden of Duchenne and Becker muscular dystrophies in Germany
Published in
Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases, December 2014
DOI 10.1186/s13023-014-0210-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Olivia Schreiber-Katz, Constanze Klug, Simone Thiele, Elisabeth Schorling, Janet Zowe, Peter Reilich, Klaus H Nagels, Maggie C Walter

Abstract

BackgroundOur study aimed to determine the burden of illness in dystrophinopathy type Duchenne (DMD) and Becker (BMD), both leading to progressive disability, reduced working capacity and high health care utilization.MethodsA micro-costing method was used to examine the direct, indirect and informal care costs measuring the economic burden of DMD in comparison to BMD on patients, relatives, payers and society in Germany and to determine the health care burden of these diseases. Standardized questionnaires were developed based on predefined structured interview guidelines to obtain data directly from patients and caregivers using the German dystrophinopathy patient registry. The health-related quality of life (HRQOL) was analyzed using PedsQLTM Measurement Model.ResultsIn total, 363 patients with genetically confirmed dystrophinopathies were enrolled. Estimated annual disease burden including direct medical/non-medical, indirect and informal care costs of DMD added up to ¿ 78,913 while total costs in BMD were ¿ 39,060. Informal care costs, indirect costs caused by loss of productivity and absenteeism of patients and caregivers as well as medical costs of rehabilitation services and medical aids were identified as the most important cost drivers. Total costs notably increased with disease progression and were consistent with the clinical severity; however, patients¿ HRQOL declined with disease progression.ConclusionIn conclusion, early assessments of economic aspects and the disease burden are essential to gain extensive knowledge of a distinct disease and above all play an important role in funding drug development programs for rare diseases. Therefore, our results may help to accelerate payer negotiations such as the pricing and reimbursement of new therapies, and will hopefully contribute to facilitating the efficient translation of innovations from clinical research over marketing authorization to patient access to a causative treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 155 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 12%
Researcher 17 11%
Other 14 9%
Student > Bachelor 11 7%
Other 27 17%
Unknown 48 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 8 5%
Other 36 23%
Unknown 54 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2015.
All research outputs
#18,401,176
of 22,792,160 outputs
Outputs from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#2,137
of 2,615 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#256,053
of 353,377 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Orphanet Journal of Rare Diseases
#70
of 92 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,792,160 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,615 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.5. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,377 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 92 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.