↓ Skip to main content

Mass media interventions: effects on health services utilisation

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2002
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
1 blog
policy
3 policy sources
twitter
4 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
380 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
424 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Mass media interventions: effects on health services utilisation
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, January 2002
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000389
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roberto Grilli, Craig Ramsay, Silvia Minozzi

Abstract

The mass media frequently cover health related topics, are the leading source of information about important health issues, and are targeted by those who aim to influence the behaviour of health professionals and patients.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 424 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 7 2%
Spain 2 <1%
Nigeria 2 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Malawi 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 407 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 68 16%
Researcher 56 13%
Student > Bachelor 49 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 49 12%
Student > Postgraduate 27 6%
Other 108 25%
Unknown 67 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 121 29%
Social Sciences 64 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 62 15%
Psychology 23 5%
Arts and Humanities 9 2%
Other 60 14%
Unknown 85 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 28. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 June 2019.
All research outputs
#722,652
of 15,490,852 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,028
of 11,200 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,093
of 217,997 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#60
of 256 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,490,852 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,200 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 217,997 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 256 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.