You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Compartmental analysis of metals in waterpipe smoking technique
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, February 2015
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12889-015-1373-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Akeel T Al-Kazwini, Adi J Said, Stephanie Sdepanian |
Abstract |
The number of waterpipe tobacco smokers has been increasing worldwide. Smokers can be exposed to a number of toxicants, some of which are metals. The aim of this study is to quantitatively determine if the water filtration stage of the waterpipe smoking process successfully decreases exposure to Bi, Cr, Cu, Fe, Mg, Mn, Mo, Ni, Pb, V, and U. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Tunisia | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Japan | 1 | 5% |
United States | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 18 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 7 | 35% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 15% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 10% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Student > Master | 1 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 5 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 20% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 15% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 5% |
Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 5% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 5% |
Other | 2 | 10% |
Unknown | 8 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 56. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2020.
All research outputs
#684,274
of 23,876,482 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#688
of 15,464 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,781
of 257,052 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#16
of 249 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,876,482 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,464 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,052 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 249 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.