You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Incidence, characteristics and outcome of ICU-acquired candidemia in India
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-014-3603-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Arunaloke Chakrabarti, Prashant Sood, Shivaprakash M. Rudramurthy, Sharon Chen, Harsimran Kaur, Malini Capoor, Deepinder Chhina, Ratna Rao, Vandana Kalwaje Eshwara, Immaculata Xess, Anupama J. Kindo, P. Umabala, Jayanthi Savio, Atul Patel, Ujjwayini Ray, Sangeetha Mohan, Ranganathan Iyer, Jagdish Chander, Anita Arora, Raman Sardana, Indranil Roy, B. Appalaraju, Ajanta Sharma, Anjali Shetty, Neelam Khanna, Rungmei Marak, Sanjay Biswas, Shukla Das, B. N. Harish, Sangeeta Joshi, Deepak Mendiratta |
| Abstract |
A systematic epidemiological study on intensive care unit (ICU)-acquired candidemia across India. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 1 | 50% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 332 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 328 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 52 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 36 | 11% |
| Researcher | 32 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 24 | 7% |
| Other | 76 | 23% |
| Unknown | 87 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 86 | 26% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 44 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 35 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 30 | 9% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 26 | 8% |
| Unknown | 104 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,069,361
of 23,979,422 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#983
of 5,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,613
of 360,611 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#6
of 78 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,979,422 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,154 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,611 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 78 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.