↓ Skip to main content

Superior vena cava drainage improves upper body oxygenation during veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in sheep

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
2 blogs
twitter
7 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Superior vena cava drainage improves upper body oxygenation during veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in sheep
Published in
Critical Care, January 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13054-015-0791-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiaotong Hou, Xiaofang Yang, Zhongtao Du, Jialin Xing, Hui Li, Chunjing Jiang, Jinhong Wang, Zhichen Xing, Shuanglei Li, Xiaokui Li, Feng Yang, Hong Wang, Hui Zeng

Abstract

Differential hypoxia is a pivotal problem in patients with femoral veno-arterial (VA) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support. Despite recognition of differential hypoxia and attempts to deliver more oxygenated blood to the upper body, the mechanism of differential hypoxia as well as prevention strategies have not been well investigated.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 3%
India 1 3%
Unknown 37 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 8 21%
Researcher 7 18%
Student > Master 4 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 10%
Professor 3 8%
Other 8 21%
Unknown 5 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 51%
Engineering 3 8%
Sports and Recreations 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 3%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 7 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2017.
All research outputs
#890,462
of 12,786,466 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#923
of 4,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,327
of 215,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#6
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,786,466 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,101 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 215,743 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.