↓ Skip to main content

Email for clinical communication between healthcare professionals

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
21 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
132 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Email for clinical communication between healthcare professionals
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd007979.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Clare Goyder, Helen Atherton, Mate Car, Carl J Heneghan, Josip Car

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
Unknown 129 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 28 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 18%
Researcher 21 16%
Unspecified 18 14%
Student > Bachelor 14 11%
Other 27 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 38%
Unspecified 23 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 14%
Social Sciences 13 10%
Psychology 12 9%
Other 16 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2017.
All research outputs
#971,348
of 12,724,322 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,150
of 10,409 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,187
of 215,846 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#91
of 258 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,724,322 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,409 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 215,846 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 258 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.