↓ Skip to main content

A field comparison of multiple techniques to quantify groundwater–surface-water interactions

Overview of attention for article published in Freshwater Science, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
112 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A field comparison of multiple techniques to quantify groundwater–surface-water interactions
Published in
Freshwater Science, March 2015
DOI 10.1086/679738
Authors

Ricardo González-Pinzón, Adam S. Ward, Christine E. Hatch, Adam N. Wlostowski, Kamini Singha, Michael N. Gooseff, Roy Haggerty, Judson W. Harvey, Olaf A. Cirpka, James T. Brock

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 112 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Unknown 107 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 32%
Student > Master 26 23%
Researcher 21 19%
Professor 7 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 4%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 1 <1%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 38 34%
Environmental Science 35 31%
Unspecified 12 11%
Engineering 12 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 11%
Other 2 2%
Unknown 1 <1%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2015.
All research outputs
#6,775,104
of 12,254,132 outputs
Outputs from Freshwater Science
#186
of 465 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#95,446
of 225,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Freshwater Science
#13
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,254,132 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 465 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,822 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.