| Title |
The Genome 10K Project: A Way Forward
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annual Review of Animal Biosciences, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1146/annurev-animal-090414-014900 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Klaus-Peter Koepfli, Benedict Paten, the Genome 10K Community of Scientists, Stephen J. O’Brien |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 18% |
| Germany | 2 | 12% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 12% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 6% |
| India | 1 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 9 | 53% |
| Members of the public | 7 | 41% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 367 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Vietnam | 1 | <1% |
| Taiwan | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 352 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 93 | 25% |
| Researcher | 65 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 39 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 37 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 20 | 5% |
| Other | 53 | 14% |
| Unknown | 60 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 155 | 42% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 84 | 23% |
| Computer Science | 9 | 2% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 2% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 36 | 10% |
| Unknown | 68 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 January 2021.
All research outputs
#2,080,630
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Annual Review of Animal Biosciences
#49
of 212 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,367
of 273,199 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annual Review of Animal Biosciences
#2
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 212 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,199 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.