↓ Skip to main content

Pulmonary rehabilitation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
2 blogs
twitter
154 tweeters
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
3 Google+ users

Citations

dimensions_citation
519 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
701 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pulmonary rehabilitation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd003793.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bernard McCarthy, Dympna Casey, Declan Devane, Kathy Murphy, Edel Murphy, Yves Lacasse

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 154 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 701 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 701 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 <1%
Student > Bachelor 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 <1%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 693 99%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 <1%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 <1%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 <1%
Unknown 693 99%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 121. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2019.
All research outputs
#128,706
of 13,633,853 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#276
of 10,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,779
of 215,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#8
of 254 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,633,853 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,695 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 215,056 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 254 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.