Randomized Trial of Peanut Consumption in Infants at Risk for Peanut Allergy

RT @doctor_bru: 知り合い医師から質問が、、、 おはようございます！ 赤ちゃんってピーナツっていつころから摂取していいんですか？ 最近だと早めに摂取するとアレルギー減るとか... https://t.co/SvizIXdezb でも周りの人に聞くとダメだと言…

RT @doctor_bru: https://t.co/mGmpliaVwx これなら 赤ちゃんに早期暴露させれるって？

RT @doctor_bru: https://t.co/mGmpliaVwx これなら 赤ちゃんに早期暴露させれるって？

@sanikufoods https://t.co/SvizIXdezb 早期暴露なら 三育さんのピーナッツバター🥜 https://t.co/mGmpliaVwx

@sanikufoods https://t.co/SvizIXdezb 早期暴露なら 三育さんのピーナッツバター🥜 https://t.co/mGmpliaVwx

https://t.co/mGmpliaVwx これなら 赤ちゃんに早期暴露させれるって？

RT @doctor_bru: 知り合い医師から質問が、、、 おはようございます！ 赤ちゃんってピーナツっていつころから摂取していいんですか？ 最近だと早めに摂取するとアレルギー減るとか... https://t.co/SvizIXdezb でも周りの人に聞くとダメだと言…

知り合い医師から質問が、、、 おはようございます！ 赤ちゃんってピーナツっていつころから摂取していいんですか？ 最近だと早めに摂取するとアレルギー減るとか... https://t.co/SvizIXdezb でも周りの人に聞くとダメだと言ったり... → ピーナッツは🥜誤嚥リスクあり…

Clinical trials later proved that "early introduction of peanut to infants between age 4 and 11 months who were at high-risk for developing peanut allergy resulted in a considerable reduction (81%) of peanut allergy" (Gupta et al JAMA Netw Open 2020) htt

@seferbamidbar @aziz0nomics Ayup! https://t.co/vAqrIX7vQg

@aziz0nomics Did you know that bamba as toddler food is how we revamped peanut allergy practice? https://t.co/vAqrIX7vQg

RT @AdiBronshtein: @DrewNagy1 @SeaMalka Actually, peanut allergy in Israel is much lower than the US, for example, because Bamba is such a…

@DrewNagy1 @SeaMalka Actually, peanut allergy in Israel is much lower than the US, for example, because Bamba is such a popular snack there - https://t.co/jooDKT5Xsz There are peer-reviewed studies that show that - https://t.co/4Ff32czxWn And - https://t.

RT @z_maha_yamame: 7ヶ月（修正月齢6ヶ月）が近づいたので、この論文を参考にピーナッツバターを与え始めている。11ヶ月以前より一度に2 g、週に最低 6 g与えるとアレルギーの発症が1.3 %に抑えられるのに対して、11ヶ月以前に全く摂取してないグループは13…

@realstewpeters @Israel Bamba 🥜😊 https://t.co/uaCqMjFjdS

@Mizore_gaming @SurelyAutomata @darioxgui @allnewsisbad @Anaxanamande @greentexts_bot https://t.co/LdsQYVduBp

@kriissaa_krae Bad advice from hack medical experts. Trying to protect a developing immune system from what it should be learning doesn’t help protect the individual. https://t.co/cxg1DyUQxk

Randomized Trial of Peanut Consumption in Infants at Risk for Peanut Allergy | NEJM https://t.co/gL87yrVjqV

@DocEkbom Allergies et diversification précoce, la publication qui avait mis fin une légende (qui circule encore) https://t.co/v092BIomWD

RT @SC_AAP: Amrol: rec starting age-appropriate foods at 4-6mos (eggs, peanut butter, etc)... no need to wait til later for potential aller…

Amrol: rec starting age-appropriate foods at 4-6mos (eggs, peanut butter, etc)... no need to wait til later for potential allergens https://t.co/KcBwe2HDHv 🥜 #scaap23

@29aatea @lemondefr Ça fait quelques années que la diversification tardive est mise en évidence dans les allergies. En particulier cette étude de 2015 sur l’arachide. https://t.co/v092BIomWD

@Batman2242 Because mothers and children started avoiding the stimulus (peanuts). Children who eat peanuts don't become allergic in anything like the same numbers: https://t.co/OBxiruIcGB

Randomized Trial of Peanut Consumption in Infants at Risk for Peanut Allergy | NEJM https://t.co/K4s1qPae0Z

swung widely in recent years. According to Kuriakose, it was once common to tell pregnant mothers to completely avoid peanuts and keep their homes nut-free if there was a past genetic history of food allergies. That changed with a study https://t.co/3aF0GY

@Maggie2Scott @Tommy__2020 @TheRealCB20 @BackAvatar @Patton_Fear_Not @caepmius @SWHMichigan77 @jamsham69 @JesseA1986 @3MC223 @Repo1127 @UMcaseyanthony @GaryIsTheDad @NoDynynTruth https://t.co/XEOzfr4OTW You are a nut. Peanut oil is not in vaccines. There

@cathomeme @ScottAdamsSays @geoffpilkington probably started with parents trying to protect their children by eliminating peanuts from the house before the child was born just in case the child was allergic. Increasing numbers of kids with the allergy cr

@adamsonjon @ian_wac @DrSeanMon Yep we had LEAP and then EAT Studies as well https://t.co/bRO9y7Eg7S https://t.co/p6XOxig2TL

Manusia itu "Antifragile"; Hal yang jadi lebih baik setelah "dirusak". Contohnya sistem imun dalam diri kita; Kemunculan alergi kacang disebabkan karena pas kecil gak nyicipin kacang, alias sistem imun yang belum kenalan sama kacang. Sumber: https://t.

Which allergist/rheumatologist has got two thumbs, a baby starting to eat solid foods, and a family history of food allergies? This guy with the basket overflowing with Bambas! Reference: https://t.co/rwf33jHhur https://t.co/CgmZOASFzD

RT @ArbleMatan: האלרגיה. הנקודת תפנית הייתה ב2015 כאשר מחקר שביצעו באנגליה הראה שאם חושפים ילדים מגיל צעיר לבוטנים, מורידים ב80 אחוז את הסי…

RT @ArbleMatan: האלרגיה. הנקודת תפנית הייתה ב2015 כאשר מחקר שביצעו באנגליה הראה שאם חושפים ילדים מגיל צעיר לבוטנים, מורידים ב80 אחוז את הסי…

תמיד חשבתי שזו בדיחה... מסתבר שאמיתי.

האלרגיה. הנקודת תפנית הייתה ב2015 כאשר מחקר שביצעו באנגליה הראה שאם חושפים ילדים מגיל צעיר לבוטנים, מורידים ב80 אחוז את הסיכוי לאלרגיה לבוטנים. זה גם הסיבה שאלרגיה לבוטנים מאוד נדירה בארץ, חטיף הבמבה שכל ילד ישראלי צורך מגיל צעיר. היום גם נעשים -> https

https://t.co/GP51EBFj5b

A trial from the NIH. https://t.co/wudHXDrhF1

ピーナッツを幼児に対して早期に食べさせることでピーナッツアレルギーの発症頻度を有意に低下させ、ピーナッツに対する免疫反応を調節することを知りました。しかし、これは経口の場合で経皮はNG! 食べるものは口から摂取しないと大変なことになるということも学びました。https://t.co/jnfUZhoecS

RT @drjohnm: To have advocated for peanut exposure in the young (before 2015) would have been promoting medical misinformation and equal to…

RT @drjohnm: To have advocated for peanut exposure in the young (before 2015) would have been promoting medical misinformation and equal to…

RT @drjohnm: To have advocated for peanut exposure in the young (before 2015) would have been promoting medical misinformation and equal to…

RT @drjohnm: To have advocated for peanut exposure in the young (before 2015) would have been promoting medical misinformation and equal to…

RT @drjohnm: To have advocated for peanut exposure in the young (before 2015) would have been promoting medical misinformation and equal to…

And yet messaging on this is ever more the reverse

RT @drjohnm: To have advocated for peanut exposure in the young (before 2015) would have been promoting medical misinformation and equal to…

RT @drjohnm: To have advocated for peanut exposure in the young (before 2015) would have been promoting medical misinformation and equal to…

RT @ID_ethics: Some public health interventions that "make sense" turn out to be wrong, even harmful E.g., It might "make sense" that kids…

RT @drjohnm: To have advocated for peanut exposure in the young (before 2015) would have been promoting medical misinformation and equal to…

RT @drjohnm: To have advocated for peanut exposure in the young (before 2015) would have been promoting medical misinformation and equal to…

RT @ID_ethics: Some public health interventions that "make sense" turn out to be wrong, even harmful E.g., It might "make sense" that kids…

RT @drjohnm: To have advocated for peanut exposure in the young (before 2015) would have been promoting medical misinformation and equal to…

RT @drjohnm: To have advocated for peanut exposure in the young (before 2015) would have been promoting medical misinformation and equal to…

RT @drjohnm: To have advocated for peanut exposure in the young (before 2015) would have been promoting medical misinformation and equal to…

RT @ID_ethics: Some public health interventions that "make sense" turn out to be wrong, even harmful E.g., It might "make sense" that kids…

RT @ID_ethics: Some public health interventions that "make sense" turn out to be wrong, even harmful E.g., It might "make sense" that kids…

RT @ID_ethics: Some public health interventions that "make sense" turn out to be wrong, even harmful E.g., It might "make sense" that kids…

RT @drjohnm: To have advocated for peanut exposure in the young (before 2015) would have been promoting medical misinformation and equal to…

To have advocated for peanut exposure in the young (before 2015) would have been promoting medical misinformation and equal to unprofessional conduct

RT @ID_ethics: Some public health interventions that "make sense" turn out to be wrong, even harmful E.g., It might "make sense" that kids…

Some public health interventions that "make sense" turn out to be wrong, even harmful E.g., It might "make sense" that kids with peanut allergy should avoid peanuts But in this trial peanut avoidance actually increased allergy: (SPT=skin prick test) ht

@emhecht @DollyGreyCloud @ACLUVA https://t.co/Cq5UWTGsF0

@gbunny @drjoelshulkin @AmerAcadPeds @AAAAI_org It had to do with this landmark study https://t.co/38UmqDKPcn

@JReinerMD The obsession with making environments nut-free has actually led to an increase in nut allergies. Avoidance-based strategies weaken people. https://t.co/tKZjd1MiBP

Here’s the NEJM article: https://t.co/C0cAH7nBGH

RT @ProfGRoberts: References: https://t.co/nT3f9m9oCY & https://t.co/hoyy3PaOhP

References: https://t.co/nT3f9m9oCY & https://t.co/hoyy3PaOhP

@drjohnm @pash22 Womens health study of HRT - https://t.co/0NgGbWCQ5m LEAP - Early peanut exposure - https://t.co/IjP6Ui6YiD

@DrRJWebb This NEJM paper that showed early exposure to peanut made you less likely to be allergic was a very neat challenge to a sort of dogma at the time I would say https://t.co/tdYMbNeJ4H

@drjohnm https://t.co/M74BH5xCWS

RT @ProfPeteSmith: Tips for Food Allergy #77 I think the LEAP study is the most important study in food allergy this century. @GoAllergy @P…

High praise indeed, thanks Pete and thanks team & participants/families. We have now assessed the participants (as well as sibs and parents), the LEAP-Trio Study ends in August, hard to believe they are 13 years of age

RT @ProfPeteSmith: Tips for Food Allergy #77 I think the LEAP study is the most important study in food allergy this century. @GoAllergy @P…

Tips for Food Allergy #77 I think the LEAP study is the most important study in food allergy this century. @GoAllergy @ProfGRoberts. Early frequent exposure to peanuts in at risk patients reduced allergies to peanut. https://t.co/H9U61HVGLb

@NoLongerBennett Freer allergies at that time, then bad advice was given, allergies increased, then it was studied and, oopsie. https://t.co/sIFCUghmQ5

RT @PedsAllergyDoc: The LEAP trial revolutionized food allergy prevention understanding. Infants with egg allergy, bad eczema, OR both rece…

RT @PedsAllergyDoc: The LEAP trial revolutionized food allergy prevention understanding. Infants with egg allergy, bad eczema, OR both rece…

RT @PedsAllergyDoc: The LEAP trial revolutionized food allergy prevention understanding. Infants with egg allergy, bad eczema, OR both rece…

RT @PedsAllergyDoc: The LEAP trial revolutionized food allergy prevention understanding. Infants with egg allergy, bad eczema, OR both rece…

The LEAP trial revolutionized food allergy prevention understanding. Infants with egg allergy, bad eczema, OR both received or avoided peanut during their first year of life. Those that received peanut had reduced incidence of peanut allergy by 85%! https:

@HelloDearVoid https://t.co/vwwCpDDDMs https://t.co/vuYSHivPQ8

@MOREcaucusUFT Ironic that you would pick an analogy where restrictions actually caused more collective harm. “Nut free” policies actually result in children with more severe nut allergies. The evidence that masking children reduces transmission is extreme

@scott_bot But also, there is a reason. This study basically rewrote the book on how we expose kids to allergens. We used to think it was important to wait to expose kids to allergens, now the advice is the opposite: allergens early and often. https://t.co

@jeffdeist One lesson we've learned as a result of the unexpected rise in peanut allergies over the last 20 yrs is that a healthy immune system also requires exercise. Complete isolation from all pathogens can cause deadly overreaction by the immune system

RT @JoeHilgard: Pleasantly surprised that the "start peanut early" advice is based on a randomized trial with a big effect and not, like, a…

RT @adamcifu: Reviewing article for our Critical Appraisal course tomorrow. One of my favorites, for obvious reasons. For no reason at all,…

RT @adamcifu: Reviewing article for our Critical Appraisal course tomorrow. One of my favorites, for obvious reasons. For no reason at all,…

RT @adamcifu: Reviewing article for our Critical Appraisal course tomorrow. One of my favorites, for obvious reasons. For no reason at all,…

RT @adamcifu: Reviewing article for our Critical Appraisal course tomorrow. One of my favorites, for obvious reasons. For no reason at all,…

Reviewing article for our Critical Appraisal course tomorrow. One of my favorites, for obvious reasons. For no reason at all, my favorite line: "Considering all adverse events, 99% of participants in each group reported at least one (adverse) event..." htt

RT @florindanpopesq: @rubin_allergy 3/ Du Toit G, Roberts G et al. Randomized Trial of Peanut Consumption in Infants at Risk for Peanut All…

RT @florindanpopesq: @rubin_allergy 3/ Du Toit G, Roberts G et al. Randomized Trial of Peanut Consumption in Infants at Risk for Peanut All…

RT @florindanpopesq: @rubin_allergy 3/ Du Toit G, Roberts G et al. Randomized Trial of Peanut Consumption in Infants at Risk for Peanut All…

RT @florindanpopesq: @rubin_allergy 3/ Du Toit G, Roberts G et al. Randomized Trial of Peanut Consumption in Infants at Risk for Peanut All…

RT @florindanpopesq: @rubin_allergy 3/ Du Toit G, Roberts G et al. Randomized Trial of Peanut Consumption in Infants at Risk for Peanut All…

@rubin_allergy 3/ Du Toit G, Roberts G et al. Randomized Trial of Peanut Consumption in Infants at Risk for Peanut Allergy. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(9):803-813 https://t.co/OdsMmiWjAG [reference of the article cited at #eaaciWS22]

@VPrasadMDMPH "Among the 530 infants in the intention-to-treat population who initially had negative results on the skin-prick test, the prevalence of peanut allergy at 60 months of age was 13.7% in the avoidance group and 1.9% in the consumption group (P&

RT @JoeHilgard: Pleasantly surprised that the "start peanut early" advice is based on a randomized trial with a big effect and not, like, a…

RT @JoeHilgard: Pleasantly surprised that the "start peanut early" advice is based on a randomized trial with a big effect and not, like, a…

RT @JoeHilgard: Pleasantly surprised that the "start peanut early" advice is based on a randomized trial with a big effect and not, like, a…

Pleasantly surprised that the "start peanut early" advice is based on a randomized trial with a big effect and not, like, a correlation with retrospective reports. https://t.co/ATCLi01GzZ

@infinitywaltz Here's a link to the data on the early introduction / desensitization work: https://t.co/3wc12FGAlo