↓ Skip to main content

The effect of haemolysis on the metabolomic profile of umbilical cord blood

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Biochemistry, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
41 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The effect of haemolysis on the metabolomic profile of umbilical cord blood
Published in
Clinical Biochemistry, May 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2015.02.004
Pubmed ID
Authors

N.M. Denihan, B.H. Walsh, S.N. Reinke, B.D. Sykes, R. Mandal, D.S. Wishart, D.I. Broadhurst, G.B. Boylan, D.M. Murray

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 39 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 20%
Student > Master 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Professor 3 7%
Other 9 22%
Unknown 4 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 17%
Chemistry 6 15%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 7 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2015.
All research outputs
#10,127,201
of 18,202,333 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Biochemistry
#973
of 1,886 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,584
of 224,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Biochemistry
#4
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 18,202,333 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,886 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,058 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.