↓ Skip to main content

Morita therapy for anxiety disorders in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Morita therapy for anxiety disorders in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008619.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hui Wu, Dehua Yu, Yanling He, Jijun Wang, Zeping Xiao, Chunbo Li

Abstract

Morita therapy, first proposed in 1919, is a systematic psychological therapy for anxiety disorders that is based on eastern philosophy. It is mainly used as an alternative therapy for anxiety disorders in Asian countries such as Japan and China. Varying foci of treatment outcomes have been reported. To date, there has been no systematic review to investigate the strength of evidence for Morita therapy in anxiety disorders.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 122 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 23%
Student > Master 27 22%
Unspecified 16 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 10%
Other 29 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 41 33%
Medicine and Dentistry 33 27%
Unspecified 20 16%
Social Sciences 7 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 5%
Other 17 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2019.
All research outputs
#1,322,871
of 13,047,699 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,868
of 10,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,026
of 214,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#107
of 255 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,047,699 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,443 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,974 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 255 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.