↓ Skip to main content

Morita therapy for anxiety disorders in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
186 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Morita therapy for anxiety disorders in adults
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008619.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hui Wu, Dehua Yu, Yanling He, Jijun Wang, Zeping Xiao, Chunbo Li

Abstract

Morita therapy, first proposed in 1919, is a systematic psychological therapy for anxiety disorders that is based on eastern philosophy. It is mainly used as an alternative therapy for anxiety disorders in Asian countries such as Japan and China. Varying foci of treatment outcomes have been reported. To date, there has been no systematic review to investigate the strength of evidence for Morita therapy in anxiety disorders.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 185 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 38 20%
Researcher 33 18%
Student > Bachelor 23 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 21 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 9%
Other 29 16%
Unknown 26 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 50 27%
Psychology 49 26%
Social Sciences 13 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 3%
Other 25 13%
Unknown 33 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2019.
All research outputs
#1,370,628
of 15,404,988 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,692
of 11,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,118
of 217,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#94
of 249 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,404,988 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,183 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 217,761 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 249 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.