You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Regime shifts, thresholds and multiple stable states in freshwater ecosystems; a critical appraisal of the evidence
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science of the Total Environment, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.02.045 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Samantha J. Capon, A. Jasmyn J. Lynch, Nick Bond, Bruce C. Chessman, Jenny Davis, Nick Davidson, Max Finlayson, Peter A. Gell, David Hohnberg, Chris Humphrey, Richard T. Kingsford, Daryl Nielsen, James R. Thomson, Keith Ward, Ralph Mac Nally |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 25 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 36% |
| Canada | 5 | 20% |
| Australia | 3 | 12% |
| Spain | 2 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 5 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 13 | 52% |
| Members of the public | 10 | 40% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 325 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Argentina | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 307 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 67 | 21% |
| Researcher | 67 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 53 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 6% |
| Professor | 15 | 5% |
| Other | 53 | 16% |
| Unknown | 52 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 129 | 40% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 84 | 26% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 13 | 4% |
| Engineering | 6 | 2% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 23 | 7% |
| Unknown | 65 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2022.
All research outputs
#2,075,981
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Science of the Total Environment
#2,796
of 30,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,100
of 270,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science of the Total Environment
#16
of 176 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 30,201 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,084 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 176 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.