| Title |
Promoting Excellence and Reflective Learning in Simulation (PEARLS)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Simulation in Healthcare, April 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1097/sih.0000000000000072 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Walter Eppich, Adam Cheng |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 124 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 22 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 14 | 11% |
| Australia | 13 | 10% |
| Canada | 8 | 6% |
| Saudi Arabia | 4 | 3% |
| Belgium | 3 | 2% |
| Ireland | 2 | 2% |
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| New Zealand | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Unknown | 43 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 59 | 48% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 43 | 35% |
| Scientists | 18 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 732 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 725 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 99 | 14% |
| Other | 82 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 55 | 8% |
| Researcher | 54 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 45 | 6% |
| Other | 198 | 27% |
| Unknown | 199 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 275 | 38% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 113 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 30 | 4% |
| Psychology | 17 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 8 | 1% |
| Other | 66 | 9% |
| Unknown | 223 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 113. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2021.
All research outputs
#379,981
of 25,805,386 outputs
Outputs from Simulation in Healthcare
#4
of 1,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,253
of 280,078 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Simulation in Healthcare
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,805,386 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,131 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,078 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them