You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Teaching approaches and strategies that promote healthy eating in primary school children: a systematic review and meta-analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12966-015-0182-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dean A Dudley, Wayne G Cotton, Louisa R Peralta |
| Abstract |
Healthy eating by primary school-aged children is important for good health and development. Schools can play an important role in the education and promotion of healthy eating among children. The aim of this review was to: 1) perform a systematic review of randomised controlled, quasi-experimental and cluster controlled trials examining the school-based teaching interventions that improve the eating habits of primary school children; and 2) perform a meta-analysis to determine the effect of those interventions. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 50 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 14% |
| United States | 6 | 12% |
| Spain | 5 | 10% |
| Australia | 5 | 10% |
| Canada | 4 | 8% |
| Belgium | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 22 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 32 | 64% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 14 | 28% |
| Scientists | 4 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 843 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Philippines | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 838 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 147 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 132 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 73 | 9% |
| Researcher | 72 | 9% |
| Other | 38 | 5% |
| Other | 147 | 17% |
| Unknown | 234 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 138 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 116 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 87 | 10% |
| Psychology | 57 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 36 | 4% |
| Other | 148 | 18% |
| Unknown | 261 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 67. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2022.
All research outputs
#616,595
of 24,917,903 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#182
of 2,082 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,520
of 260,683 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#6
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,917,903 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,082 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 28.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 260,683 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.