The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 42 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
INTERNATIONAL PALLIATIVE CARE JOURNAL CLUB ON TWITTER: EXPERIENCE SO FAR
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care , March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjspcare-2014-000838.48 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
T Whitburn, C Walshe, KE Sleeman |
| Abstract |
@hpmJC (hospice and palliative medicine Journal Club, #hpmJC) was launched in February 2014 on the social networking service Twitter, as a regular international journal club for palliative care. The journal club aims to encourage critical analysis of research methods and findings, and to promote evidence based practice, by providing a forum to discuss latest research findings. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 14% |
| Australia | 4 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 7% |
| Netherlands | 2 | 5% |
| Colombia | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 24 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 27 | 64% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 21% |
| Scientists | 5 | 12% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 5 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 1 | 17% |
| Other | 1 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 33% |
| Psychology | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2016.
All research outputs
#1,377,211
of 26,277,952 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care
#130
of 1,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,433
of 271,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Supportive & Palliative Care
#2
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,277,952 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,897 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,434 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.