↓ Skip to main content

Scientific Opinion on the substantiation of a health claim related to “L‐tug lycopene” and reduction of blood LDL‐cholesterol pursuant to Article 14 of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006

Overview of attention for article published in EFSA Journal, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Scientific Opinion on the substantiation of a health claim related to “L‐tug lycopene” and reduction of blood LDL‐cholesterol pursuant to Article 14 of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006
Published in
EFSA Journal, February 2015
DOI 10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4025

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 1 25%
Researcher 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 50%
Unknown 2 50%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 May 2015.
All research outputs
#2,078,769
of 12,521,542 outputs
Outputs from EFSA Journal
#548
of 2,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,774
of 216,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EFSA Journal
#17
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,521,542 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,937 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 216,230 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.