↓ Skip to main content

Antiplatelet agents for preventing thrombosis after peripheral arterial bypass surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
87 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
153 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Antiplatelet agents for preventing thrombosis after peripheral arterial bypass surgery
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd000535.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rachel Bedenis, Anne Lethaby, Heather Maxwell, Stefan Acosta, Martin H Prins

Abstract

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD) may cause occlusions (blockages) in the main arteries of lower limbs. One treatment option is bypass surgery using autologous (the patient's own tissue) vein graft or prosthetic (artificial) graft. A number of factors influence occlusion rates in these patients, including the material used. To prevent graft occlusion patients are usually treated with antiplatelet, antithrombotic drugs, or a combination of both.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 149 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 27 18%
Researcher 26 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 8%
Student > Postgraduate 12 8%
Other 37 24%
Unknown 20 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 80 52%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 4%
Social Sciences 5 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 3%
Other 17 11%
Unknown 25 16%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 March 2020.
All research outputs
#10,154,902
of 17,356,510 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#9,480
of 11,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,418
of 221,553 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#199
of 248 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,356,510 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,661 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.0. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,553 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 248 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.