↓ Skip to main content

Therapeutic exercise for rotator cuff tendinopathy: a systematic review of contextual factors and prescription parameters

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#2 of 337)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
130 tweeters
facebook
12 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
192 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Therapeutic exercise for rotator cuff tendinopathy: a systematic review of contextual factors and prescription parameters
Published in
International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, February 2015
DOI 10.1097/mrr.0000000000000113
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chris Littlewood, Peter Malliaras, Ken Chance-Larsen, Littlewood C, Malliaras P, Chance-Larsen K

Abstract

Exercise is widely regarded as an effective intervention for symptomatic rotator cuff tendinopathy but the prescription is diverse and the important components of such programmes are not well understood. The objective of this study was to systematically review the contextual factors and prescription parameters of published exercise programmes for rotator cuff tendinopathy, to generate recommendations based on current evidence. An electronic search of AMED, CiNAHL, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, PEDro and SPORTDiscus was undertaken from their inception to June 2014 and supplemented by hand searching. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials evaluating the effectiveness of exercise in participants with rotator cuff tendinopathy. Included studies were appraised using the Cochrane risk of bias tool and synthesized narratively. Fourteen studies were included, and suggested that exercise programmes are widely applicable and can be successfully designed by physiotherapists with varying experience; whether the exercise is completed at home or within a clinic setting does not appear to matter and neither does pain production or pain avoidance during exercise; inclusion of some level of resistance does seem to matter although the optimal level is unclear, the optimal number of repetitions is also unclear but higher repetitions might confer superior outcomes; three sets of exercise are preferable to two or one set but the optimal frequency is unknown; most programmes should demonstrate clinically significant outcomes by 12 weeks. This systematic review has offered preliminary guidance in relation to contextual factors and prescription parameters to aid development and application of exercise programmes for rotator cuff tendinopathy.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 130 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 192 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 2 1%
Australia 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 185 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 44 23%
Student > Master 39 20%
Other 29 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 8%
Unspecified 12 6%
Other 52 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 86 45%
Nursing and Health Professions 56 29%
Unspecified 18 9%
Sports and Recreations 8 4%
Arts and Humanities 5 3%
Other 19 10%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 94. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2018.
All research outputs
#145,601
of 12,381,422 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Rehabilitation Research
#2
of 337 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,852
of 224,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Rehabilitation Research
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,381,422 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 337 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,101 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them