↓ Skip to main content

Interventions to reduce waiting times for elective procedures.

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
20 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
273 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions to reduce waiting times for elective procedures.
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005610.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ballini L, Negro A, Maltoni S, Vignatelli L, Flodgren G, Simera I, Holmes J, Grilli R, Ballini, Luciana, Negro, Antonella, Maltoni, Susanna, Vignatelli, Luca, Flodgren, Gerd, Simera, Iveta, Holmes, Jane, Grilli, Roberto

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 273 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Unknown 271 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 62 23%
Researcher 39 14%
Student > Bachelor 33 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 6%
Other 52 19%
Unknown 40 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 95 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 46 17%
Social Sciences 16 6%
Psychology 14 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 3%
Other 36 13%
Unknown 57 21%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2016.
All research outputs
#1,398,699
of 14,604,041 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,895
of 11,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,780
of 214,598 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#103
of 252 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 14,604,041 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,020 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,598 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 252 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.