↓ Skip to main content

Interventions to reduce waiting times for elective procedures.

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
20 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
207 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Interventions to reduce waiting times for elective procedures.
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd005610.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ballini L, Negro A, Maltoni S, Vignatelli L, Flodgren G, Simera I, Holmes J, Grilli R, Ballini, Luciana, Negro, Antonella, Maltoni, Susanna, Vignatelli, Luca, Flodgren, Gerd, Simera, Iveta, Holmes, Jane, Grilli, Roberto

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 207 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 205 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 48 23%
Researcher 30 14%
Unspecified 28 14%
Student > Bachelor 25 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 12%
Other 50 24%
Unknown 1 <1%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 75 36%
Unspecified 42 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 15%
Social Sciences 15 7%
Psychology 12 6%
Other 31 15%
Unknown 1 <1%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2016.
All research outputs
#1,103,948
of 12,612,419 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#3,543
of 10,376 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,450
of 215,621 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#100
of 258 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,612,419 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,376 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 215,621 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 258 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.