↓ Skip to main content

Surgical versus non-surgical interventions for treating patellar dislocation

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
36 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
278 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Surgical versus non-surgical interventions for treating patellar dislocation
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, February 2015
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd008106.pub3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Toby O Smith, Simon Donell, Fujian Song, Caroline B Hing

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 278 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 277 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 48 17%
Student > Master 47 17%
Researcher 25 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 8%
Student > Postgraduate 22 8%
Other 53 19%
Unknown 60 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 104 37%
Nursing and Health Professions 39 14%
Psychology 15 5%
Social Sciences 10 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 3%
Other 26 9%
Unknown 76 27%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2020.
All research outputs
#967,017
of 17,188,187 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#2,559
of 11,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,644
of 221,372 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#64
of 249 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 17,188,187 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,636 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,372 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 249 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.