↓ Skip to main content

Social Media in the Emergency Medicine Residency Curriculum: Social Media Responses to the Residents’ Perspective Article

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Emergency Medicine, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
59 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Social Media in the Emergency Medicine Residency Curriculum: Social Media Responses to the Residents’ Perspective Article
Published in
Annals of Emergency Medicine, May 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2015.01.018
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bryan D. Hayes, Scott Kobner, N. Seth Trueger, Stella Yiu, Michelle Lin

Abstract

In July to August 2014, Annals of Emergency Medicine continued a collaboration with an academic Web site, Academic Life in Emergency Medicine (ALiEM), to host an online discussion session featuring the 2014 Annals Residents' Perspective article "Integration of Social Media in Emergency Medicine Residency Curriculum" by Scott et al. The objective was to describe a 14-day worldwide clinician dialogue about evidence, opinions, and early relevant innovations revolving around the featured article and made possible by the immediacy of social media technologies. Six online facilitators hosted the multimodal discussion on the ALiEM Web site, Twitter, and YouTube, which featured 3 preselected questions. Engagement was tracked through various Web analytic tools, and themes were identified by content curation. The dialogue resulted in 1,222 unique page views from 325 cities in 32 countries on the ALiEM Web site, 569,403 Twitter impressions, and 120 views of the video interview with the authors. Five major themes we identified in the discussion included curriculum design, pedagogy, and learning theory; digital curation skills of the 21st-century emergency medicine practitioner; engagement challenges; proposed solutions; and best practice examples. The immediacy of social media technologies provides clinicians the unique opportunity to engage a worldwide audience within a relatively short time frame.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
United Kingdom 1 2%
South Africa 1 2%
Mexico 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 53 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 19%
Other 11 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 12%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 8%
Other 19 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 58%
Unspecified 9 15%
Computer Science 3 5%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Materials Science 2 3%
Other 8 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 45. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2017.
All research outputs
#312,433
of 12,196,947 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Emergency Medicine
#307
of 4,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,677
of 222,637 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Emergency Medicine
#21
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,196,947 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,404 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 222,637 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.