↓ Skip to main content

Energy development and avian nest survival in Wyoming, USA: A test of a common disturbance index

Overview of attention for article published in Biological Conservation, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
13 tweeters
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
80 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Energy development and avian nest survival in Wyoming, USA: A test of a common disturbance index
Published in
Biological Conservation, April 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.02.009
Authors

Matthew G. Hethcoat, Anna D. Chalfoun

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 5%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 75 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 22 28%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 23%
Researcher 14 18%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Other 5 6%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 4 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 45 56%
Environmental Science 20 25%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Physics and Astronomy 1 1%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 1%
Other 1 1%
Unknown 11 14%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2015.
All research outputs
#768,193
of 12,238,739 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#670
of 3,540 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#19,963
of 222,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#31
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,238,739 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,540 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 222,823 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.