↓ Skip to main content

BMC Sports science, medicine, and rehabilitation reviewer acknowledgement 2014

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
BMC Sports science, medicine, and rehabilitation reviewer acknowledgement 2014
Published in
BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, February 2015
DOI 10.1186/2052-1847-7-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Partridge, Clare

Abstract

The editors of Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation would like to thank all our reviewers who have contributed to the journal in Volume 6 (2014).

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 February 2015.
All research outputs
#3,409,654
of 4,814,322 outputs
Outputs from BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation
#81
of 102 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,437
of 143,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 4,814,322 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 102 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 143,606 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.