↓ Skip to main content

Social marketing interventions to increase HIV/STI testing uptake among men who have sex with men and male‐to‐female transgender women

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
365 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Social marketing interventions to increase HIV/STI testing uptake among men who have sex with men and male‐to‐female transgender women
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009337
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chongyi Wei, Amy Herrick, H Fisher Raymond, Andrew Anglemyer, Antonio Gerbase, Seth M Noar

Abstract

Social marketing interventions have been shown to both promote and change many health-related behaviours and issues. As the HIV epidemic continues to disproportionately affect MSM and transgender women around the world, social marketing interventions have the potential to increase HIV/STI testing uptake among these populations.

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 365 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 1%
United States 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
El Salvador 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 352 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 60 16%
Student > Master 52 14%
Student > Bachelor 40 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 9%
Student > Postgraduate 20 5%
Other 80 22%
Unknown 79 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 102 28%
Social Sciences 56 15%
Psychology 31 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 7%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 10 3%
Other 50 14%
Unknown 90 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2016.
All research outputs
#18,028,965
of 26,367,306 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#11,685
of 13,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,503
of 139,421 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#92
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,367,306 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,215 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.6. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 139,421 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.