↓ Skip to main content

Foam dressings for healing diabetic foot ulcers

Overview of attention for article published in Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Foam dressings for healing diabetic foot ulcers
Published in
Cochrane database of systematic reviews, September 2011
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd009111.pub2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dumville JC, Deshpande S, O'Meara S, Speak K, Dumville, Jo C, Deshpande, Sohan, O'Meara, Susan, Speak, Katharine

Abstract

Foot ulcers in people with diabetes are a prevalent and serious global health issue. Dressings form a key part of ulcer treatment, with clinicians and patients having many different types to choose from. A clear and current overview of current evidence is required to facilitate decision-making regarding dressing use.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 2%
Spain 1 2%
India 1 2%
Unknown 51 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 19%
Other 10 19%
Student > Bachelor 7 13%
Student > Master 7 13%
Researcher 5 9%
Other 11 20%
Unknown 4 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 13%
Engineering 6 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Computer Science 2 4%
Other 9 17%
Unknown 5 9%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 September 2011.
All research outputs
#9,293,737
of 12,100,779 outputs
Outputs from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#6,268
of 7,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,119
of 86,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cochrane database of systematic reviews
#34
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,100,779 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,978 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 86,242 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.