↓ Skip to main content

Cafeína para o tratamento de dor

Overview of attention for article published in Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (Science Direct), June 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 tweeter

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
90 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Cafeína para o tratamento de dor
Published in
Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (Science Direct), June 2012
DOI 10.1590/s0034-70942012000300011
Authors

Cristiane Tavares, Rioko Kimiko Sakata

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 tweeter who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 89 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 26 29%
Student > Master 12 13%
Student > Postgraduate 7 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 3%
Other 3 3%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 29 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 10%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 8 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 8%
Other 24 27%
Unknown 28 31%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2015.
All research outputs
#15,450,375
of 22,959,818 outputs
Outputs from Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (Science Direct)
#91
of 272 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#105,593
of 165,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology (Science Direct)
#8
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,959,818 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 272 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.6. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,951 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.