You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Optimal stomatal behaviour around the world
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nature Climate Change, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1038/nclimate2550 |
| Authors |
Yan-Shih Lin, Belinda E. Medlyn, Remko A. Duursma, I. Colin Prentice, Han Wang, Sofia Baig, Derek Eamus, Victor Resco de Dios, Patrick Mitchell, David S. Ellsworth, Maarten Op de Beeck, Göran Wallin, Johan Uddling, Lasse Tarvainen, Maj-Lena Linderson, Lucas A. Cernusak, Jesse B. Nippert, Troy W. Ocheltree, David T. Tissue, Nicolas K. Martin-StPaul, Alistair Rogers, Jeff M. Warren, Paolo De Angelis, Kouki Hikosaka, Qingmin Han, Yusuke Onoda, Teresa E. Gimeno, Craig V. M. Barton, Jonathan Bennie, Damien Bonal, Alexandre Bosc, Markus Löw, Cate Macinins-Ng, Ana Rey, Lucy Rowland, Samantha A. Setterfield, Sabine Tausz-Posch, Joana Zaragoza-Castells, Mark S. J. Broadmeadow, John E. Drake, Michael Freeman, Oula Ghannoum, Lindsay B. Hutley, Jeff W. Kelly, Kihachiro Kikuzawa, Pasi Kolari, Kohei Koyama, Jean-Marc Limousin, Patrick Meir, Antonio C. Lola da Costa, Teis N. Mikkelsen, Norma Salinas, Wei Sun, Lisa Wingate |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 12% |
| United States | 3 | 9% |
| Spain | 3 | 9% |
| France | 3 | 9% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Norway | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 14 | 42% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 21 | 64% |
| Scientists | 9 | 27% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 555 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 7 | 1% |
| France | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Costa Rica | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 538 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 140 | 25% |
| Researcher | 114 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 64 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 35 | 6% |
| Professor | 26 | 5% |
| Other | 72 | 13% |
| Unknown | 104 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 155 | 28% |
| Environmental Science | 132 | 24% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 65 | 12% |
| Engineering | 23 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 2% |
| Other | 28 | 5% |
| Unknown | 141 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2016.
All research outputs
#1,156,267
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Nature Climate Change
#1,821
of 4,266 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,146
of 274,336 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Climate Change
#53
of 107 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,266 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 131.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,336 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 107 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.