↓ Skip to main content

Optimal stomatal behaviour around the world

Overview of attention for article published in Nature Climate Change, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (56th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
twitter
36 tweeters
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
116 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
346 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Optimal stomatal behaviour around the world
Published in
Nature Climate Change, March 2015
DOI 10.1038/nclimate2550
Authors

Yan-Shih Lin, Belinda E. Medlyn, Remko A. Duursma, I. Colin Prentice, Han Wang, Sofia Baig, Derek Eamus, Victor Resco de Dios, Patrick Mitchell, David S. Ellsworth, Maarten Op de Beeck, Göran Wallin, Johan Uddling, Lasse Tarvainen, Maj-Lena Linderson, Lucas A. Cernusak, Jesse B. Nippert, Troy W. Ocheltree, David T. Tissue, Nicolas K. Martin-StPaul, Alistair Rogers, Jeff M. Warren, Paolo De Angelis, Kouki Hikosaka, Qingmin Han, Yusuke Onoda, Teresa E. Gimeno, Craig V. M. Barton, Jonathan Bennie, Damien Bonal, Alexandre Bosc, Markus Löw, Cate Macinins-Ng, Ana Rey, Lucy Rowland, Samantha A. Setterfield, Sabine Tausz-Posch, Joana Zaragoza-Castells, Mark S. J. Broadmeadow, John E. Drake, Michael Freeman, Oula Ghannoum, Lindsay B. Hutley, Jeff W. Kelly, Kihachiro Kikuzawa, Pasi Kolari, Kohei Koyama, Jean-Marc Limousin, Patrick Meir, Antonio C. Lola da Costa, Teis N. Mikkelsen, Norma Salinas, Wei Sun, Lisa Wingate

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 36 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 346 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 3%
Spain 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Costa Rica 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Unknown 328 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 103 30%
Researcher 74 21%
Student > Master 52 15%
Unspecified 30 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 6%
Other 67 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 126 36%
Environmental Science 99 29%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 45 13%
Unspecified 45 13%
Engineering 14 4%
Other 17 5%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 38. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2016.
All research outputs
#428,655
of 13,181,286 outputs
Outputs from Nature Climate Change
#1,017
of 2,840 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,736
of 214,224 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nature Climate Change
#42
of 96 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,181,286 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,840 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 83.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 214,224 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 96 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.