↓ Skip to main content

A laboratory investigation of interactions between denitrifying anaerobic methane oxidation (DAMO) and anammox processes in anoxic environments

Overview of attention for article published in Scientific Reports, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
30 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
116 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
A laboratory investigation of interactions between denitrifying anaerobic methane oxidation (DAMO) and anammox processes in anoxic environments
Published in
Scientific Reports, March 2015
DOI 10.1038/srep08706
Authors

Shihu Hu, Raymond J. Zeng, Mohamed F. Haroon, Jurg Keller, Paul A. Lant, Gene W. Tyson, Zhiguo Yuan

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 116 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Mexico 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 108 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 38%
Student > Bachelor 15 13%
Student > Master 14 12%
Unspecified 12 10%
Researcher 9 8%
Other 22 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 37 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 22%
Unspecified 21 18%
Engineering 15 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Other 14 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2015.
All research outputs
#3,263,981
of 12,476,678 outputs
Outputs from Scientific Reports
#18,475
of 57,150 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,001
of 216,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scientific Reports
#42
of 160 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,476,678 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 57,150 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 216,667 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 160 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.