Am I normal? A systematic review and construction of nomograms for flaccid and erect penis length and circumference in up to 15 521 men

Overview of attention for article published in British Journal of Urology, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#1 of 2,812)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
224 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Am I normal? A systematic review and construction of nomograms for flaccid and erect penis length and circumference in up to 15 521 men
Published in
British Journal of Urology, March 2015
DOI 10.1111/bju.13010
Pubmed ID
Authors

David Veale, Sarah Miles, Sally Bramley, Gordon Muir, John Hodsoll, Veale, David, Miles, Sarah, Bramley, Sally, Muir, Gordon, Hodsoll, John, Veale, D, Miles, S, Bramley, S, Muir, G, Hodsoll, J, Veale D, Miles S, Bramley S, Muir G, Hodsoll J

Abstract

To systematically review and create nomograms on flaccid and erect penile size measurements.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 566 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 224 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 4%
United Kingdom 7 3%
Germany 5 2%
France 4 2%
Italy 4 2%
Norway 4 2%
Brazil 3 1%
Czech Republic 3 1%
Australia 2 <1%
Other 12 5%
Unknown 171 76%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 54 24%
Researcher 48 21%
Other 31 14%
Student > Master 25 11%
Student > Bachelor 17 8%
Other 49 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 79 35%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 46 21%
Psychology 22 10%
Chemistry 11 5%
Physics and Astronomy 11 5%
Other 55 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1215. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2017.
All research outputs
#867
of 7,436,338 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of Urology
#1
of 2,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35
of 198,855 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of Urology
#1
of 95 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 7,436,338 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,812 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 198,855 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 95 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.