↓ Skip to main content

Collective unconscious: How gut microbes shape human behavior

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Psychiatric Research, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#18 of 3,551)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
345 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1341 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Collective unconscious: How gut microbes shape human behavior
Published in
Journal of Psychiatric Research, April 2015
DOI 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2015.02.021
Pubmed ID
Authors

Timothy G. Dinan, Roman M. Stilling, Catherine Stanton, John F. Cryan

Abstract

The human gut harbors a dynamic and complex microbial ecosystem, consisting of approximately 1 kg of bacteria in the average adult, approximately the weight of the human brain. The evolutionary formation of a complex gut microbiota in mammals has played an important role in enabling brain development and perhaps sophisticated social interaction. Genes within the human gut microbiota, termed the microbiome, significantly outnumber human genes in the body, and are capable of producing a myriad of neuroactive compounds. Gut microbes are part of the unconscious system regulating behavior. Recent investigations indicate that these microbes majorly impact on cognitive function and fundamental behavior patterns, such as social interaction and stress management. In the absence of microbes, underlying neurochemistry is profoundly altered. Studies of gut microbes may play an important role in advancing understanding of disorders of cognitive functioning and social interaction, such as autism.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 233 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,341 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 9 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Germany 2 <1%
Poland 2 <1%
Belgium 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Other 10 <1%
Unknown 1308 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 280 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 188 14%
Researcher 185 14%
Student > Master 185 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 79 6%
Other 228 17%
Unknown 196 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 280 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 182 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 151 11%
Neuroscience 121 9%
Psychology 112 8%
Other 251 19%
Unknown 244 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 401. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2023.
All research outputs
#64,142
of 23,371,053 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Psychiatric Research
#18
of 3,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#662
of 265,825 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Psychiatric Research
#2
of 55 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,371,053 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,551 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,825 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 55 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.