The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 61 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Evaluating conservation and fisheries management strategies by linking spatial prioritization software and ecosystem and fisheries modelling tools
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Applied Ecology, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1111/1365-2664.12404 |
| Authors |
Kristian Metcalfe, Sandrine Vaz, Georg H. Engelhard, Maria Ching Villanueva, Robert J. Smith, Steven Mackinson |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 15% |
| United States | 4 | 7% |
| Sweden | 2 | 3% |
| Taiwan | 1 | 2% |
| Australia | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Iceland | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 36 | 59% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 49 | 80% |
| Scientists | 9 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 207 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Greece | 1 | <1% |
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 200 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 43 | 21% |
| Researcher | 42 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 35 | 17% |
| Unknown | 25 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 73 | 35% |
| Environmental Science | 62 | 30% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 14 | 7% |
| Unknown | 44 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 78. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 February 2023.
All research outputs
#569,868
of 26,086,865 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Ecology
#331
of 4,131 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,582
of 273,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Ecology
#3
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,086,865 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,131 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,911 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.