You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Economic Evaluation of Neutral-pH, Low–Glucose Degradation Product Peritoneal Dialysis Solutions Compared With Standard Solutions: A Secondary Analysis of the balANZ Trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
American Journal of Kidney Diseases, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.12.017 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kirsten Howard, Alison Hayes, Yeoungjee Cho, Alan Cass, Margaret Clarke, David W. Johnson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 33 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 18% |
| Researcher | 6 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 15% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 9% |
| Other | 6 | 18% |
| Unknown | 5 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 47% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 12% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 3 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Psychology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 9% |
| Unknown | 6 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2015.
All research outputs
#15,740,505
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Kidney Diseases
#4,474
of 5,429 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,177
of 272,750 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Kidney Diseases
#47
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,429 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.9. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,750 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.