↓ Skip to main content

Economic Evaluation of Neutral-pH, Low–Glucose Degradation Product Peritoneal Dialysis Solutions Compared With Standard Solutions: A Secondary Analysis of the balANZ Trial

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Kidney Diseases, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
30 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Economic Evaluation of Neutral-pH, Low–Glucose Degradation Product Peritoneal Dialysis Solutions Compared With Standard Solutions: A Secondary Analysis of the balANZ Trial
Published in
American Journal of Kidney Diseases, May 2015
DOI 10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.12.017
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kirsten Howard, Alison Hayes, Yeoungjee Cho, Alan Cass, Margaret Clarke, David W. Johnson

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Australia 1 3%
Unknown 29 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 20%
Researcher 6 20%
Student > Master 5 17%
Professor 3 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 10%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 3 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 10%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 4 13%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 November 2015.
All research outputs
#7,484,971
of 13,293,718 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Kidney Diseases
#2,678
of 3,447 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#92,576
of 215,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Kidney Diseases
#41
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 13,293,718 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,447 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.9. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 215,212 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.