↓ Skip to main content

Developments in the scientific and clinical understanding of fibromyalgia

Overview of attention for article published in Arthritis Research & Therapy, October 2009
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
157 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Developments in the scientific and clinical understanding of fibromyalgia
Published in
Arthritis Research & Therapy, October 2009
DOI 10.1186/ar2720
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dan Buskila

Abstract

Our understanding of fibromyalgia (FM) has made significant advances over the past decade. The current concept views FM as the result of central nervous system malfunction resulting in amplification of pain transmission and interpretation. Research done over the past years has demonstrated a role for polymorphisms of genes in the serotoninergic, dopaminergic and catecholaminergic systems in the etiopathogenesis of FM. Various external stimuli such as infection, trauma and stress may contribute to the development of the syndrome. The management of FM requires an integrated approach combining pharmacological and nonpharmacological modalities. The recent Food and Drugs Administration approval of pregabalin, duloxetine and milnacipran as medications for FM may herald a new era for the development of medications with higher specificity and efficacy for the condition. As our understanding of the biological basis and the genetic underpinning of FM increases, we hope to gain a better understanding of the true nature of the disorder, to better classify patients and to attain more rational therapeutic modalities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Israel 2 1%
New Zealand 2 1%
Bulgaria 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 145 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 21 13%
Student > Bachelor 19 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 11%
Student > Master 14 9%
Other 46 29%
Unknown 23 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 55 35%
Psychology 16 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 14 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 9%
Sports and Recreations 6 4%
Other 24 15%
Unknown 28 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2023.
All research outputs
#15,740,207
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#2,289
of 3,381 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,546
of 105,736 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Arthritis Research & Therapy
#25
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,381 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 105,736 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.