↓ Skip to main content

Dynamic navicular motion measured using a stretch sensor is different between walking and running, and between over‐ground and treadmill conditions

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
51 X users
facebook
7 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
14 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
104 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dynamic navicular motion measured using a stretch sensor is different between walking and running, and between over‐ground and treadmill conditions
Published in
Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, February 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13047-015-0063-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christian J Barton, Simon L Kappel, Peter Ahrendt, Ole Simonsen, Michael S Rathleff

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 51 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Luxembourg 1 <1%
Unknown 99 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 20%
Student > Bachelor 13 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 7%
Other 6 6%
Other 21 20%
Unknown 24 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 26%
Sports and Recreations 23 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 10%
Engineering 6 6%
Unspecified 2 2%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 29 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 33. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2015.
All research outputs
#1,261,859
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
#3
of 6 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#15,174
of 271,153 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Foot and Ankle Research
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.8. This one scored the same or higher as 3 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,153 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them