↓ Skip to main content

Stable Isotope Anatomy of Tropical Cyclone Ita, North-Eastern Australia, April 2014

Overview of attention for article published in PLoS ONE, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Stable Isotope Anatomy of Tropical Cyclone Ita, North-Eastern Australia, April 2014
Published in
PLoS ONE, March 2015
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0119728
Pubmed ID
Authors

Niels C. Munksgaard, Costijn Zwart, Naoyuki Kurita, Adrian Bass, Jon Nott, Michael I. Bird, Munksgaard NC, Zwart C, Kurita N, Bass A, Nott J, Bird MI

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 3%
Unknown 31 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 41%
Researcher 7 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Professor 1 3%
Other 4 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 19 59%
Environmental Science 7 22%
Unspecified 3 9%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2015.
All research outputs
#5,790,290
of 11,134,098 outputs
Outputs from PLoS ONE
#54,121
of 125,513 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,920
of 209,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLoS ONE
#1,634
of 3,644 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,134,098 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 125,513 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 209,288 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,644 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.