You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Stable Isotope Anatomy of Tropical Cyclone Ita, North-Eastern Australia, April 2014
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0119728 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Niels C. Munksgaard, Costijn Zwart, Naoyuki Kurita, Adrian Bass, Jon Nott, Michael I. Bird |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 57 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 31% |
| Researcher | 11 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 10 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 26 | 45% |
| Environmental Science | 9 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Linguistics | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 12 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2015.
All research outputs
#14,804,483
of 22,793,427 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#123,749
of 194,547 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,333
of 257,881 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#2,848
of 5,362 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,793,427 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,547 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 257,881 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,362 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.