↓ Skip to main content

Stable Isotope Anatomy of Tropical Cyclone Ita, North-Eastern Australia, April 2014

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Stable Isotope Anatomy of Tropical Cyclone Ita, North-Eastern Australia, April 2014
Published in
PLOS ONE, March 2015
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0119728
Pubmed ID
Authors

Niels C. Munksgaard, Costijn Zwart, Naoyuki Kurita, Adrian Bass, Jon Nott, Michael I. Bird

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Mexico 1 2%
Unknown 50 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 17 33%
Researcher 10 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 12%
Student > Master 4 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 8 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Earth and Planetary Sciences 23 45%
Environmental Science 8 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 10%
Arts and Humanities 1 2%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 3 6%
Unknown 10 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2015.
All research outputs
#8,219,420
of 15,219,624 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#70,213
of 153,808 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,463
of 217,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,734
of 3,703 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 15,219,624 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 153,808 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 217,887 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,703 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.