You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
‘Need-to-Know’ emergency medicine articles of 2014
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Emergency Medicine, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12245-015-0055-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maite A Huis in ‘t Veld, Tu C Nguyen, Joseph P Martinez, Amal Mattu |
| Abstract |
Every year, thousands of articles are published in numerous medical journals that relate to the clinical practice of medicine. However, it is impossible for a single clinician to stay abreast of the literature, let alone to determine which articles should change daily practice. Physicians in our department have searched the emergency medicine and the specialty literature of 2014 to determine which articles are most relevant to the clinical practice of emergency medicine, summarized them, and listed key take-home points from these 'need-to-know' articles. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 91 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 18 | 20% |
| Netherlands | 8 | 9% |
| Canada | 5 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 4% |
| South Africa | 2 | 2% |
| Puerto Rico | 2 | 2% |
| Spain | 2 | 2% |
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| Costa Rica | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 14% |
| Unknown | 33 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 50 | 55% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 31 | 34% |
| Scientists | 7 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 28 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 21% |
| Other | 5 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
| Researcher | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 8 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 41% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Psychology | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 8 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 66. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 July 2015.
All research outputs
#644,666
of 25,362,278 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Emergency Medicine
#12
of 652 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,884
of 273,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Emergency Medicine
#2
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,362,278 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 652 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,965 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 8 of them.