↓ Skip to main content

Divergences in gene repertoire among the reference Prevotella genomes derived from distinct body sites of human

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 tweeters
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
68 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Divergences in gene repertoire among the reference Prevotella genomes derived from distinct body sites of human
Published in
BMC Genomics, January 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12864-015-1350-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vinod Gupta, Narendrakumar M Chaudhari, Suchismitha Iskepalli, Chitra Dutta

Abstract

The community composition of the human microbiome is known to vary at distinct anatomical niches. But little is known about the nature of variations, if any, at the genome/sub-genome levels of a specific microbial community across different niches. The present report aims to explore, as a case study, the variations in gene repertoire of 28 Prevotella reference genomes derived from different body-sites of human, as reported earlier by the Human Microbiome Consortium.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 68 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
India 1 1%
France 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 65 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 25%
Student > Master 9 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 4%
Other 10 15%
Unknown 6 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 37%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 21%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 9%
Chemistry 3 4%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 8 12%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2016.
All research outputs
#2,236,650
of 11,012,252 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#1,332
of 6,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,553
of 208,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#60
of 243 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 11,012,252 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,752 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 208,850 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 243 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.