↓ Skip to main content

Thyroid Hormones and Cardiovascular Function and Diseases

Overview of attention for article published in JACC, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
153 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
6 Facebook pages
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
285 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
353 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Thyroid Hormones and Cardiovascular Function and Diseases
Published in
JACC, April 2018
DOI 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.02.045
Pubmed ID
Authors

Salman Razvi, Avais Jabbar, Alessandro Pingitore, Sara Danzi, Bernadette Biondi, Irwin Klein, Robin Peeters, Azfar Zaman, Giorgio Iervasi

Abstract

Thyroid hormone (TH) receptors are present in the myocardium and vascular tissue, and minor alterations in TH concentration can affect cardiovascular (CV) physiology. The potential mechanisms that link CV disease with thyroid dysfunction are endothelial dysfunction, changes in blood pressure, myocardial systolic and diastolic dysfunction, and dyslipidemia. In addition, cardiac disease itself may lead to alterations in TH concentrations (notably, low triiodothyronine syndrome) that are associated with higher morbidity and mortality. Experimental data and small clinical trials have suggested a beneficial role of TH in ameliorating CV disease. The aim of this review is to provide clinicians dealing with CV conditions with an overview of the current knowledge of TH perturbations in CV disease.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 153 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 353 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 353 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 46 13%
Researcher 37 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 7%
Other 23 7%
Student > Master 22 6%
Other 51 14%
Unknown 148 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 119 34%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 14 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 2%
Other 23 7%
Unknown 156 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 93. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 January 2023.
All research outputs
#466,821
of 25,887,951 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#1,143
of 16,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,413
of 346,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#46
of 409 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,887,951 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,985 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,246 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 409 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.