You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Essential oil and aromatic plants as feed additives in non-ruminant nutrition: a review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40104-015-0004-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zhaikai Zeng, Sai Zhang, Hongliang Wang, Xiangshu Piao |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 67% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 462 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Slovenia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 458 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 84 | 18% |
| Researcher | 55 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 35 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 35 | 8% |
| Other | 70 | 15% |
| Unknown | 146 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 180 | 39% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 41 | 9% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 21 | 5% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 9 | 2% |
| Other | 35 | 8% |
| Unknown | 162 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2017.
All research outputs
#8,261,756
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology
#155
of 903 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#89,066
of 269,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology
#5
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 903 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,966 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 5 of them.