↓ Skip to main content

Vegetarian Dietary Patterns and the Risk of Colorectal Cancers

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA Internal Medicine, May 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#29 of 3,221)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
108 news outlets
blogs
11 blogs
twitter
649 tweeters
facebook
97 Facebook pages
googleplus
8 Google+ users
video
5 video uploaders

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
202 Mendeley
Title
Vegetarian Dietary Patterns and the Risk of Colorectal Cancers
Published in
JAMA Internal Medicine, May 2015
DOI 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.59
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael J. Orlich, Pramil N. Singh, Joan Sabaté, Jing Fan, Lars Sveen, Hannelore Bennett, Synnove F. Knutsen, W. Lawrence Beeson, Karen Jaceldo-Siegl, Terry L. Butler, R. Patti Herring, Gary E. Fraser

Abstract

Colorectal cancers are a leading cause of cancer mortality, and their primary prevention by diet is highly desirable. The relationship of vegetarian dietary patterns to colorectal cancer risk is not well established.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 649 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 202 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Kenya 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Unknown 195 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 44 22%
Student > Bachelor 38 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 13%
Researcher 23 11%
Other 18 9%
Other 53 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 83 41%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 13%
Unspecified 16 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 6%
Other 35 17%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1432. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2018.
All research outputs
#1,323
of 12,144,158 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Internal Medicine
#29
of 3,221 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36
of 222,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Internal Medicine
#2
of 193 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,144,158 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,221 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 122.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 222,971 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 193 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.