↓ Skip to main content

Vegetarian Dietary Patterns and the Risk of Colorectal Cancers

Overview of attention for article published in JAMA Internal Medicine, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#36 of 2,569)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
56 news outlets
blogs
9 blogs
twitter
675 tweeters
facebook
94 Facebook pages
googleplus
7 Google+ users
video
1 video uploader

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
Title
Vegetarian Dietary Patterns and the Risk of Colorectal Cancers
Published in
JAMA Internal Medicine, March 2015
DOI 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.59
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael J. Orlich, Pramil N. Singh, Joan Sabaté, Jing Fan, Lars Sveen, Hannelore Bennett, Synnove F. Knutsen, W. Lawrence Beeson, Karen Jaceldo-Siegl, Terry L. Butler, R. Patti Herring, Gary E. Fraser, Orlich MJ, Singh PN, Sabaté J, Fan J, Sveen L, Bennett H, Knutsen SF, Beeson WL, Jaceldo-Siegl K, Butler TL, Herring RP, Fraser GE

Abstract

Colorectal cancers are a leading cause of cancer mortality, and their primary prevention by diet is highly desirable. The relationship of vegetarian dietary patterns to colorectal cancer risk is not well established.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 675 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Kenya 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Unknown 104 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 26 24%
Student > Bachelor 19 17%
Researcher 17 16%
Other 12 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 11%
Other 23 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 57 52%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Engineering 3 3%
Other 16 15%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1031. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2017.
All research outputs
#1,530
of 7,943,431 outputs
Outputs from JAMA Internal Medicine
#36
of 2,569 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63
of 201,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JAMA Internal Medicine
#3
of 199 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 7,943,431 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,569 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 108.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,310 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 199 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.