You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Intervention strategies to improve nutrition and health behaviours before conception
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Lancet, April 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1016/s0140-6736(18)30313-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mary Barker, Stephan U Dombrowski, Tim Colbourn, Caroline H D Fall, Natasha M Kriznik, Wendy T Lawrence, Shane A Norris, Gloria Ngaiza, Dilisha Patel, Jolene Skordis-Worrall, Falko F Sniehotta, Régine Steegers-Theunissen, Christina Vogel, Kathryn Woods-Townsend, Judith Stephenson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 236 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 58 | 25% |
| United States | 22 | 9% |
| Australia | 14 | 6% |
| Netherlands | 9 | 4% |
| Ireland | 7 | 3% |
| India | 6 | 3% |
| Canada | 6 | 3% |
| Spain | 6 | 3% |
| Chile | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 28 | 12% |
| Unknown | 76 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 124 | 53% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 61 | 26% |
| Scientists | 48 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 3 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 966 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 966 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 132 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 104 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 97 | 10% |
| Researcher | 83 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 48 | 5% |
| Other | 165 | 17% |
| Unknown | 337 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 157 | 16% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 152 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 69 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 38 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 32 | 3% |
| Other | 155 | 16% |
| Unknown | 363 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 430. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2022.
All research outputs
#67,602
of 25,724,500 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#1,096
of 42,965 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,500
of 325,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#20
of 270 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,724,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,965 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 68.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,075 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 270 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.