↓ Skip to main content

Scientific Opinion on Dietary Reference Values for vitamin A

Overview of attention for article published in EFSA Journal, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
4 tweeters
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Scientific Opinion on Dietary Reference Values for vitamin A
Published in
EFSA Journal, March 2015
DOI 10.2903/j.efsa.2015.4028

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 1 13%
Researcher 1 13%
Unspecified 1 13%
Unknown 5 63%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 25%
Unspecified 1 13%
Unknown 5 63%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 24. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2018.
All research outputs
#615,013
of 12,801,967 outputs
Outputs from EFSA Journal
#139
of 3,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,580
of 216,046 outputs
Outputs of similar age from EFSA Journal
#4
of 79 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 12,801,967 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,442 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 216,046 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 79 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.