↓ Skip to main content

Learning Evaluation: blending quality improvement and implementation research methods to study healthcare innovations

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
31 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
95 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
306 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Learning Evaluation: blending quality improvement and implementation research methods to study healthcare innovations
Published in
Implementation Science, March 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13012-015-0219-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bijal A Balasubramanian, Deborah J Cohen, Melinda M Davis, Rose Gunn, L Miriam Dickinson, William L Miller, Benjamin F Crabtree, Kurt C Stange

Abstract

In healthcare change interventions, on-the-ground learning about the implementation process is often lost because of a primary focus on outcome improvements. This paper describes the Learning Evaluation, a methodological approach that blends quality improvement and implementation research methods to study healthcare innovations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 306 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 300 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 55 18%
Researcher 44 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 12%
Other 20 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 20 7%
Other 65 21%
Unknown 66 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 64 21%
Social Sciences 42 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 38 12%
Psychology 21 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 19 6%
Other 44 14%
Unknown 78 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2021.
All research outputs
#1,751,932
of 24,217,496 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#351
of 1,755 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,644
of 263,096 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#16
of 45 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,496 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,755 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 263,096 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 45 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.